USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-11097
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PACOMIO BLANCO-RUIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00454-WMR-CCB-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 2 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-11097
Before WILSON, LUCK, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Pacomio Blanco‑Ruiz appeals from the district court’s writ-
ten judgment ordering an eight‑month term of imprisonment fol-
lowing the revocation of his supervised release. He asserts his sen-
tence should be vacated and remanded for imposition of a cor-
rected judgment because the written judgment conflicts with the
oral pronouncement at sentencing. The Government agrees that
we should remand to allow the district court to correct the judg-
ment to conform with the six-month term.
“When a sentence pronounced orally and unambiguously
conflicts with the written order of judgment, the oral pronounce-
ment governs.” United States v. Bates,
213 F.3d 1336, 1340 (11th Cir.
2000). The remedy for a conflict between an orally pronounced
sentence and the written judgment is a limited remand with in-
structions to amend the judgment to conform to the oral pro-
nouncement. United States v. Chavez,
204 F.3d 1305, 1316 (11th Cir.
2000).
The written judgment unambiguously contradicts the oral
pronouncement at sentencing because it imposes an eight‑month
sentence, but the district court said twice at sentencing that it was
varying downward from eight months to six months. Blanco-Ruiz
does not offer any other arguments challenging the revocation of
his supervised release or his six-month sentence, and therefore, has
abandoned any such challenges. See United States v. Campbell, 26
USCA11 Case: 23-11097 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023 Page: 3 of 3
23-11097 Opinion of the Court
3
F.4th 860, 873 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied,
143 S. Ct. 95 (2022)
(stating an issue not raised on appeal will be deemed abandoned
and will not be addressed on appeal absent extraordinary circum-
stances). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Blanco-Ruiz’s
supervised release and his sentence and remand to the district court
for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to conform with
the oral pronouncement of a six-month term of imprisonment.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
