United States v. Keeo Miller ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA11 Case: 23-11743   Document: 7-1      Date Filed: 07/24/2023   Page: 1 of 2
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    In the
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eleventh Circuit
    ____________________
    No. 23-11743
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ____________________
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    KEEO MILLER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ____________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Georgia
    D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00169-LGW-CLR-1
    ____________________
    USCA11 Case: 23-11743      Document: 7-1       Date Filed: 07/24/2023      Page: 2 of 2
    2                       Opinion of the Court                    23-11743
    Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, as duplicative of ap-
    peal no. 20-10194. Keeo Miller again appeals his final criminal judg-
    ment, but we already affirmed that judgment in January 2023. See
    United States v. Arlt, 
    567 F.2d 1295
    , 1297 (5th Cir. 1978) (providing
    that an appellant “is not entitled to two appeals” from the same
    order or judgment). Although Miller apparently now wishes to
    challenge his sentence, which he did not do in his original appeal,
    he was required to “raise all claims of error in a single appeal fol-
    lowing final judgment on the merits.” See Firestone Tire & Rubber
    Co. v. Risjord, 
    449 U.S. 368
    , 374 (1981); see also United States v. Curry,
    
    760 F.2d 1079
    , 1079 (11th Cir. 1985) (“In a criminal case the final
    judgment means the sentence. The sentence is the judgment.”).
    No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
    with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
    other applicable rules.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-11743

Filed Date: 7/24/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/24/2023