Carlese Hall v. FCI Tallahassee Warden ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA11 Case: 23-11814   Document: 6-1      Date Filed: 08/10/2023   Page: 1 of 3
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    In the
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eleventh Circuit
    ____________________
    No. 23-11814
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ____________________
    CARLESE J. HALL,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    FCI TALLAHASSEE WARDEN,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    ____________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    D.C. Docket No. 4:21-cv-00393-MW-MAL
    ____________________
    USCA11 Case: 23-11814       Document: 6-1       Date Filed: 08/10/2023     Page: 2 of 3
    2                        Opinion of the Court                   23-11814
    Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
    tion. Carlese Hall appeals from the district court’s April 13, 2023
    order granting in part and denying in part respondent Erica
    Strong’s motion to dismiss Hall’s 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     petition. That
    order is not final and appealable, however, because it did not end
    the litigation on the merits in the district court.                See
    
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    ; Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 
    22 F.4th 979
    , 986
    (11th Cir. 2022) (stating that a final order ends the litigation on the
    merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute its judg-
    ment).
    Grounds one and two of Hall’s § 2241 petition remain pend-
    ing before the district court, and the district court did not certify its
    order for immediate review under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
    54(b). See Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 
    689 F.3d 1244
    , 1246
    (11th Cir. 2012) (noting that an order that disposes of fewer than all
    claims against all parties to an action is not immediately appealable
    absent certification pursuant to Rule 54(b)). Additionally, the dis-
    trict court’s April 13, 2023 order is not effectively unreviewable on
    appeal from a final order resolving the case on the merits. Plaintiff
    A v. Schair, 
    744 F.3d 1247
    , 1253 (11th Cir. 2014) (explaining that a
    ruling that does not conclude the litigation may be appealed under
    the collateral order doctrine if it, inter alia, is “effectively unreview-
    able on appeal from a final judgment”).
    USCA11 Case: 23-11814    Document: 6-1     Date Filed: 08/10/2023    Page: 3 of 3
    23-11814              Opinion of the Court                       3
    No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
    with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
    other applicable rules.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-11814

Filed Date: 8/10/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/10/2023