USCA11 Case: 23-12937 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-12937
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
WILLIAM T. WALKER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant,
CORIZON, LLC,
JEFFERSON DUNN,
WARDEN,
SCOTT BELL,
M.D.,
MICHAEL BOROWICZ,
USCA11 Case: 23-12937 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 2 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12937
M.D., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cv-01176-CLM-NAD
____________________
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. The statutory time limit required William Walker to file a no-
tice of appeal from the district court’s August 29, 2022 judgment by
December 14, 2022, which was 30 days after the district court dis-
posed of Walker’s motion challenging the judgment under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See
28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App.
P. 4(a)(1)(A), (4)(A). However, Walker did not file his notice of ap-
peal until August 29, 2023. See Houston v. Lack,
487 U.S. 266, 276
(1988).
Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin.,
606 F.3d 1296,
USCA11 Case: 23-12937 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 3 of 3
23-12937 Opinion of the Court 3
1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
entertain an appeal that is out of time).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
