Charles Weinacker v. Petfriendly, Inc. ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA11 Case: 23-12901       Document: 22-1      Date Filed: 10/13/2023   Page: 1 of 3
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    In the
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eleventh Circuit
    ____________________
    No. 23-12901
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ____________________
    CHARLES WEINACKER,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    AARON SHADDY,
    an individual, et al.,
    Defendants,
    PETFRIENDLY, INC.,
    PET FRIENDLY DIRECT, LLC,
    Nebraska limited liability corporations,
    USCA11 Case: 23-12901      Document: 22-1       Date Filed: 10/13/2023     Page: 2 of 3
    2                       Opinion of the Court                  23-12901
    Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees,
    WWW.PETFRIENDLYDIRECT.COM,
    a.k.a. www.petfriendlybox.com,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    ____________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Alabama
    D.C. Docket No. 1:22-cv-00028-TFM-MU
    ____________________
    Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
    tion. Charles Weinacker, pro se, appeals the district court’s August
    4, 2023 order that dismissed, in whole or in part, four of the eight
    counts in Weinacker’s second amended complaint and allowed the
    remaining counts to proceed. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal
    because the August 4 order was not final or otherwise appealable.
    See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    ; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 
    235 F.3d 1325
    , 1327 (11th Cir. 2000). Because the August 4 order expressly
    allowed several of Weinacker’s claims to proceed, and those claims
    remain pending, that order is not a final or otherwise appealable
    USCA11 Case: 23-12901     Document: 22-1     Date Filed: 10/13/2023    Page: 3 of 3
    23-12901              Opinion of the Court                       3
    decision. See Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 
    689 F.3d 1244
    ,
    1245-46 (11th Cir. 2012).
    No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
    with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
    other applicable rules.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-12901

Filed Date: 10/13/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2023