Douglas K. Raborn v. Deborah C. Menotte , 280 F. App'x 835 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT             FILED
    _____________________________U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    JUNE 3, 2008
    No. 05-16260
    _____________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
    CLERK
    D. C. Docket No. 04-81186-CV-DTKH & 01-134529-BKC-SH
    DOUGLAS K. RABORN,
    Debtor,
    __________________________________________________________________
    DOUGLAS K. RABORN,
    RICHARD B. RABORN,
    ROBIN RABORN,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    versus
    DEBORAH MENOTTE, Trustee,
    Trustee in Bankruptcy for Douglas K. Raborn,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    _________________________________________
    (June 3, 2008)
    Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    In this case, a Bankruptcy Trustee has tried to include some land in the
    bankruptcy estate of Douglas K. Raborn. But the land had come to Douglas K.
    Raborn in a document entitled “Conveyance Deed to Trustee Under Trust
    Agreement,” and the document purports to convey the land to “Douglas K.
    Raborn, as Trustee under the Raborn Farm Trust Agreement dated January 25,
    1991.” A dispute arose about whether the land could be lawfully included in
    Raborn’s bankruptcy estate. The Bankruptcy Trustee argued “Yes”; and he
    prevailed in the District Court.
    On appeal, we faced an issue of state law—the meaning of the
    conveyance—that we considered outcome determinative. Setting out the
    background in some detail, we certified the state law issue to the Supreme Court
    of Florida. In re Raborn, 
    470 F.3d 1319
     (11th Cir. 2006).
    The Supreme Court of Florida clarified the applicable state law for us. See
    Raborn v. Manotte, 
    974 So. 2d 328
     (Fla. 2008) (holding that the deed in question
    conveys the land in trust, not fee simple).
    2
    In the light of the Florida opinion, we conclude that the pertinent land
    cannot be part of the bankruptcy estate. Therefore, we vacate the grant of
    summary judgment to the Bankruptcy Trustee and remand for further proceedings.
    VACATED and REMANDED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-16260

Citation Numbers: 470 F.3d 1319, 280 F. App'x 835

Judges: Edmondson, Barkett, Cox

Filed Date: 6/3/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024