Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc. , 156 F.2d 62 ( 1946 )

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that Revised Maximum Price Regulation 287 contains no provision fixing the maximum price of garments which do not have the proper minimum allowable cost. Acceptance of this contention concededly requires us to disagree with Bowles v. Biberman Bros., 3 Cir., 152 F.2d 700. We do not disagree with it. On the authority of that case judgment is affirmed.