Evaristo Serrano Vargas v. ( 2018 )

DLD-231 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 18-2104
___________
IN RE: EVARISTO SERRANO VARGAS,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-17-cv-00801)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
June 7, 2018
Before: JORDAN, SHWARTZ and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: June 12, 2018)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Evaristo Serrano Vargas filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we
direct the District Court to rule on a petition that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2241. The District Court has since ruled on Serrano Vargas’s § 2241 petition. In light of
the District Court’s action, the question Serrano Vargas presented is no longer a live
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v.
Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992).
2