Gonda v. Metro Life Ins Co ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                                            Opinions of the United
    2005 Decisions                                                                                                             States Court of Appeals
    for the Third Circuit
    11-17-2005
    Gonda v. Metro Life Ins Co
    Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
    Docket No. 04-4188
    Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005
    Recommended Citation
    "Gonda v. Metro Life Ins Co" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 216.
    http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/216
    This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
    University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
    University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
    NOT PRECEDENTIAL
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-4188
    ___________
    RONALD M. GONDA,
    Appellant
    v.
    METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;
    WILLIAM FREIDT, JR.
    ___________
    On Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Pennsylvania
    (D.C. Civil No. 00-cv-02286)
    District Judge: The Honorable Donetta W. Ambrose
    ___________
    Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
    October 18, 2005
    Before: SMITH, STAPLETON, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.
    (Filed November 17, 2005)
    ___________
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    ___________
    NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
    Appellant Ronald Gonda appeals the District Court’s grant of Appellee
    Metropolitan Life Insurance’s (“Met Life”) motion for summary judgment on claims
    arising from the purchase of a life insurance policy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     and, guided by our opinions in Dilworth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
    Co., 
    418 F.3d 345
     (3d Cir. 2005) and Tran v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 
    408 F.3d 130
     (3d Cir. 2005), we will reverse.
    Because this case presents to us facts and issues almost identical to that in
    our not-precedential opinion in Wyckoff v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., No. 04-4098
    (3d Cir. 2005). we will accordingly reverse and remand for substantially the same reasons
    as set out therein.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-4188

Filed Date: 11/17/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015