Rinastuti v. Attorney General of the United States ( 2012 )

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 12-1978
___________
DHANY DINAR RINASTUTI,
Petitioner
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
Respondent
____________________________________
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
(Agency No. A088-649-516)
Immigration Judge: Honorable Rosalind K. Malloy
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
October 17, 2012
Before: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: October 18, 2012)
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
Dhany Rinastuti, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the
agency’s denial of relief. This is the companion case to C.A. No. 12-1977; Rinastuti is
the partner of Ufuq Abror, the petitioner in that matter, and the relevant facts and issues
in both matters are identical. Rinastuti fears potential persecution in Indonesia on
account of a possible familial veto of her desired marriage to Abror, and also worries
about societal disapproval of her children being born out of wedlock. For substantially
the same reasons that we recited in 12-1977, however, Rinastuti has failed to show any
basis to disturb the agency’s final order of removal. We must therefore deny this petition
for review.1
1
We exercise jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, as limited by 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(a)(3)
and 1252(d)(1).
2