United States v. Branch ( 2005 )

Opinions of the United
2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
7-12-2005
USA v. Branch
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 04-2160
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005
Recommended Citation
"USA v. Branch" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 871.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/871
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
No. 04-2160
____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
TERRANCE BRANCH,
Appellant
____________
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the District of Delaware
D.C. No.: 03-cr-00011
District Judge: Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
____________
Argued December 13, 2004
Decided January 20, 2005
Certiorari Granted May 16, 2005
Judgment Vacated and Remanded from the
Supreme Court of the United States
May 24, 2005
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) July 8, 2005
____________
Before: *NYGAARD, BECKER, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.
(Filed: July 12, 2005)
____________
OPINION OF THE COURT
____________
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Terrance Branch was convicted of possessing a firearm in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. He
was tried by jury and subsequently sentenced to 120 months in prison. Branch timely
appealed his conviction to this Court, but did not challenge his sentence.
We affirmed his conviction in United States v. Branch, No. 04-2160, slip op. at 4
(3d Cir. Jan. 20, 2005). The Supreme Court granted certiorari. In Branch v. United
States, 125 S. Ct. 2281 (2005), the Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded
for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. -- (2005).
After further consideration, we reaffirm the District Court’s judgment of
conviction for the reasons set forth in our opinion of January 20, 2005. However, in light
of Booker, the appellant’s sentence must be reviewed and its appropriateness ascertained.
Because we believe that this is best determined by the District Court in the first instance,
we will vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with Booker.
United States v. Davis, 407 F.3d 162, 165 (3d Cir. 2005) (en banc).
*The Honorable Judge Richard L. Nygaard assumed senior status on July 9, 2005.
2