Claude Clark v. SEPTA ( 2009 )

Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-13-2009 Claude Clark v. SEPTA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-1531 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "Claude Clark v. SEPTA" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 2044. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/2044 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 08-1531 CLAUDE J. CLARK, Appellant v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 06-cv-04497) District Judge: Honorable Paul S. Diamond Submitted December 8, 2008 Before: MCKEE, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges. (Filed: January 13, 2009) OPINION MCKEE, Circuit Judge. Claude Clark appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Agency (“SEPTA”) and against him on the 1 claim he brought under the Americans with Disability Act, the Rehabilitation Act and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. Since we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with the background of this case, we need not repeat the factual or procedural history. We have reviewed Judge Diamond’s thoughtful and careful Memorandum, dated January 24, 2008, in which the district court explains why defendant is entitled to summary judgment and why plaintiff is not. We can add little to the district court’s analysis and will therefore affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in that Memorandum. 2