Duncan Morgen-Westrick v. Pennsylvania State University ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                                                  NOT PRECEDENTIAL
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
    _____________
    No. 22-2767
    _____________
    DUNCAN MORGEN-WESTRICK,
    Appellant
    v.
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    ______________
    On Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    (D.C. No. 2-20-cv-03335)
    District Judge: Honorable Cynthia M. Rufe
    ______________
    Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on
    September 19, 2023
    ______________
    Before: RESTREPO, McKEE, RENDELL Circuit Judges
    (Opinion filed: October 4, 2023)
    _______________________
    OPINION
    _______________________
    
    This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and under I.O.P. 5.7 does not
    constitute binding precedent.
    McKEE, Circuit Judge.
    Duncan Morgen-Westrick appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment
    to Pennsylvania State University in this dispute over a grade he received in a course he
    took at the defendant university. Morgen-Westrick contends that he was “constructively
    discharged over failure to carry out defendant’s promises to provide reasonable
    accommodation” for him. Appellant’s Br. at 3. He asserts claims under the Americans
    with Disabilities Act, 
    42 U.S.C. § 12101
     et seq., and for breach of contract, promissory
    estoppel, and due process violations. Essentially, the grade given to Morgen-Westrick,
    after extensions were provided for him to complete assignments, was below the grade he
    needed to be reimbursed by his employer for his tuition, which limited his ability to
    pursue a master’s degree.
    In her detailed and thoughtful opinion, Judge Rufe carefully and clearly explained
    her reasons for granting summary judgment for Pennsylvania State University in this case
    arising from the disputed grade.1 We can add little to Judge Rufe’s analysis and
    discussion and we will therefore affirm the District Court’s order substantially for the
    reasons set forth in that opinion.
    1
    See Morgen-Westrick v. Pa. State Univ., No. 2-20-cv-03335, 
    2022 WL 3691014
     (E.D.
    Pa. Aug. 25, 2022).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-2767

Filed Date: 10/4/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/4/2023