Lorena Canales-Reyes v. Jefferson Sessions III , 686 F. App'x 211 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-2162
    LORENA CANALES-REYES,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
    Submitted: April 13, 2017                                         Decided: April 26, 2017
    Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting
    Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Meadow Platt, Office of
    Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
    D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Lorena Canales-Reyes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an
    order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the
    immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for withholding of removal and
    protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the
    record, including the various documentary exhibits, the transcript of Canales-Reyes’
    merits hearing, and her supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does
    not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C.
    § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See
    INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 481 (1992).
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
    See In re Canales-Reyes (B.I.A. Sept. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2162

Citation Numbers: 686 F. App'x 211

Judges: Motz, Thacker, Hamilton

Filed Date: 4/26/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024