Goodson v. Holcomb ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 97-2054
    BOBBY GENE GOODSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICHARD D. HOLCOMB, Commissioner of DMV, Com-
    monwealth of Virginia; JEAN A. JONES, Super-
    visor of Driver Monitoring, Division of DMV of
    Virginia; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, Area Officer;
    SAM H. MCVEY, Sergeant; VANCE CORVIN, Magis-
    trate; THOMAS L. HUTTON, General District
    Court; DAVID BROWN, Retired Judge; CHARLES B.
    FLANNAGAN, Circuit Court of the City of Bris-
    tol, Virginia; ROBERT B. DICKERT, Assistant
    Attorney, City of Bristol,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
    trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.
    (CA-97-83-A)
    Submitted:   December 11, 1997         Decided:     December 23, 1997
    Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Bobby Gene Goodson, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,
    Assistant Attorney General, Eric Karl Gould Fiske, Rita Marie
    Sampson, Gregory E. Lucyk, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Steven Ray Minor, ELLIOTT, LAWSON &
    POMRENKE, Bristol, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and
    deny Appellant's motion for default judgment. Goodson v. Holcomb,
    No. CA-97-83-A (W.D. Va. July 11, 1997). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-2054

Filed Date: 12/23/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014