ronald-lee-simmons-sr-v-edward-w-murray-director-of-virginia , 19 F.3d 1430 ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • 19 F.3d 1430

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
    Ronald Lee SIMMONS, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, Director of Virginia Department of
    Corrections; Doctor Lou Cei, Chairman of the Central
    Classification Board; James A. Smith, Jr., Regional
    Administrator; E.E. Wright, Warden, Greensville
    Correctional Center, P.A. Terrangi, Deputy Warden,
    Greensville Correctional Center, Unit C; G.L. Bass, Deputy
    Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Unit A; J.C.
    Farrow, Treatment Program Supervisor, Greensville
    Correctional Center, Unit A; M.S. Reynolds, Counselor,
    Greensville Correctional Center, Unit A; D. Smith, Warden,
    Buckingham Correctional Center; Fred Russell, Executive
    Director, Virginia State Crime Commission, Defendants Appellees.

    No. 94-6031.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

    Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
    Decided March 17, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1227)

    Ronald Lee Simmons, Sr., appellant pro se.

    Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

    E.D.Va.

    AFFIRMED.

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Murray, No. CA-92-1227 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    2

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: 94-6031

Citation Numbers: 19 F.3d 1430, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12935

Filed Date: 3/17/1994

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021