United States v. Spencer Webb , 588 F. App'x 251 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                   UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-7321
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    SPENCER   TYRONE    WEBB,   a/k/a    Stanley     Cooper,   a/k/a   Corey
    Cooper,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.     Rebecca Beach Smith,
    Chief District Judge. (4:10-cr-00014-RBS-DEM-1)
    Submitted:   December 16, 2014                  Decided:   December 19, 2014
    Before DUNCAN       and   DIAZ,   Circuit   Judges,    and   DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Spencer Tyrone Webb, Appellant Pro Se.     Eric Matthew Hurt,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Spencer   Tyrone    Webb     seeks       to   appeal     the    district
    court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)
    motion.    Parties in a civil action in which the United States or
    an officer or agency of the federal government is a party are
    accorded   sixty   days   after   the       entry   of   the    district    court’s
    final judgment or order to note an appeal.                      Fed. R. App. P.
    4(a)(1)(B).    “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a
    civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”                   Bowles v. Russell,
    
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    Because Webb is incarcerated, the notice of appeal is
    considered filed on the date it was properly delivered to prison
    officials for mailing to the court.                 Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1);
    Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    , 276 (1988).                The record does not
    conclusively reveal when Webb delivered the notice of appeal to
    prison officials for mailing.           Accordingly, we remand the case
    for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain
    this information from the parties and to determine whether the
    filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v.
    Lack.     The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to
    this court for further consideration.
    REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-7321

Citation Numbers: 588 F. App'x 251

Judges: Duncan, Diaz, Davis

Filed Date: 12/19/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024