Juan Lozano-Bolanos v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 588 F. App'x 272 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1311
    JUAN REYES LOZANO-BOLANOS,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   November 20, 2014              Decided:   December 19, 2014
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Eileen P. Blessinger, Heather M. Cleary, BLESSINGER LEGAL, PLLC
    Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery,
    Assistant   Attorney  General,   Terri   J.  Scadron,   Assistant
    Director, Meadow W. Platt, Office of Immigration Litigation,
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Juan Reyes Lozano-Bolanos, a native and citizen of El
    Salvador,     petitions       for    review      of    an   order        of    the     Board    of
    Immigration      Appeals       (Board)       dismissing        his        appeal          of   the
    Immigration Judge’s decision finding that he was convicted of a
    particularly        serious    crime    and      pretermitting           his        request    for
    withholding of removal. *            We have thoroughly reviewed the record,
    including      the        relevant     exhibits         and        the        transcript        of
    Lozano-Bolanos’ merits hearing, and conclude that the Board did
    not   abuse    its    discretion       in    finding        that    Lozano-Bolanos             was
    convicted      of     a    particularly          serious      crime           and     thus     was
    ineligible      for       withholding        of       removal.            See         8    U.S.C.
    § 1231(b)(3)(B)(ii) (2012).                 Accordingly, we deny the petition
    for review for the reasons stated by the Board.                                     See In re:
    Lozano-Bolanos (B.I.A. Mar. 26, 2014).                        We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    *
    On appeal, Lozano-Bolanos does not challenge the denial of
    his applications for asylum and for protection under the
    Convention Against Torture.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1311

Citation Numbers: 588 F. App'x 272

Judges: King, Duncan, Floyd

Filed Date: 12/19/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024