In re: Starsha Sewell ( 2021 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2304
In re: STARSHA SEWELL,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00114)
Submitted: April 22, 2021 Decided: April 26, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order returning certain pleadings to her
pursuant to a previously imposed prefiling injunction. * On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sewell’s informal
brief and various supplements do not challenge the district court’s rationale, she has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177
(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules,
our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We deny Sewell’s motion for enforcement. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent that Sewell contests the prefiling injunction, we note that this court
previously affirmed that order. See In re Sewell, 732 F. App’x 221 (4th Cir. 2018) (No. 18-
1298).
2