Elvis Jones v. The Virginia ACA ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-6267
    ELVIS WAYNE JONES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THE VIRGINIA ACA; QUINN MICHAEL, The Virginia Attorney; THE
    AMERICAN CORRECTION ASSOCIATION; UNITED STATES COURT OF
    APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00158-RAJ-RJK)
    Submitted: April 22, 2021                                         Decided: April 26, 2021
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Elvis Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Elvis Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
    his civil action for failure to comply with the district court’s prior order to submit an
    amended 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     complaint and statutory filing fee or in forma pauperis
    application within the allotted time. Before this appeal was filed, Jones submitted to the
    district court an amended § 1983 complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis. Because Jones now has complied with the district court’s prior order and the
    district court will obtain jurisdiction to review the filings upon disposition of this appeal,
    we conclude there is no relief Jones could obtain by way of this appeal, and we dismiss the
    appeal as moot. See CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v. Wynne, 
    792 F.3d 469
    , 474 (4th
    Cir. 2015) (“Litigation may become moot during the pendency of an appeal when an
    intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant effective relief to the prevailing
    party.”). We further deny Jones’ motions for federal transit extension, summary judgment,
    default judgment, and injunctive relief pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-6267

Filed Date: 4/26/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/26/2021