Elvis Jones v. ACA ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-6255
    ELVIS WAYNE JONES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THE AMERICAN CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATION, Standards and Accreditation
    Department; THE VIRGINIA CONTROLLER; THE ACA- POLUNSKY AUDITS;
    POLUNSKY FACULTY,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00100-RAJ-LRL)
    Submitted: April 22, 2021                                         Decided: April 26, 2021
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Elvis Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Elvis Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
    his civil action for failure to comply with the court’s prior order to submit an amended 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     complaint and statutory filing fee or in forma pauperis application within
    the allotted time. Before this appeal was filed, Jones submitted to the district court an
    amended § 1983 complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because
    Jones now has complied with the district court’s prior order and the district court will obtain
    jurisdiction to review the filings upon disposition of this appeal, we conclude there is no
    relief Jones could obtain by way of this appeal, and we dismiss the appeal as moot. See
    CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v. Wynne, 
    792 F.3d 469
    , 474 (4th Cir. 2015) (“Litigation
    may become moot during the pendency of an appeal when an intervening event makes it
    impossible for the court to grant effective relief to the prevailing party.”). We further deny
    Jones’ motions for federal transit extension, summary judgment, default judgment, and
    injunctive relief pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-6255

Filed Date: 4/26/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/26/2021