William Watts, II v. United States , 589 F. App'x 224 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-7542
    WILLIAM T. WATTS, II,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES; FBI; UNKNOWN FBI AGENTS,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.   Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
    (8:14-cv-02659-TMC-JDA)
    Submitted:   January 15, 2015              Decided:   January 21, 2015
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William T. Watts, II, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    William T. Watts, II, seeks to appeal the district
    court’s   order      adopting       the    recommendation              of    the    magistrate
    judge and dismissing some but not all of his claims in an action
    filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
    Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
    (1971), and the Freedom of
    Information       Act,   5   U.S.C.       §§ 551-52     (2012).              This   court   may
    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
    (2012),     and     certain        interlocutory            and    collateral          orders.
    28 U.S.C.     § 1292     (2012);      Fed.       R.    Civ.       P.    54(b);      Cohen    v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                                  The
    order Watts seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.                                Accordingly, we
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                                We dispense with
    oral   argument      because       the     facts      and    legal          contentions     are
    adequately    presented       in    the     materials        before          this   court   and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-7542

Citation Numbers: 589 F. App'x 224

Judges: Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Davis

Filed Date: 1/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024