U. S. ex rel. Mark W. Prince v. Virginia Resources Authority ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1690
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. MARK W. PRINCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
SHENANDOAH COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; U. S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; SUNTRUST BANK; SUNTRUST EQUIPMENT FINANCE &
LEASING CORPORATION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00045-MFU)
Submitted: January 29, 2015 Decided: February 13, 2015
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Glenn Pollack, Woodstock, Virginia, for Appellant.
Jeffrey M. Summers, THE LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY M. SUMMERS, PLLC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark W. Prince appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his qui tam action against Virginia Resources
Authority and others under the False Claims Act, see 31 U.S.C. §
3729(a)-3733 et seq. (2012), and denying Prince’s motion to
alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have
reviewed the arguments on appeal and the record, and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States ex rel. Prince v. Va. Res.
Auth., No. 5:13-cv-00045-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2014; July 10,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3