John Dykeman v. Warden, Lieber Correctional , 586 F. App'x 131 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-6977
    JOHN DYKEMAN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South   Carolina,  at  Anderson.     Jacquelyn   Denise  Austin,
    Magistrate Judge. (8:13-cv-02933-MGL-JDA)
    Submitted:   November 20, 2014            Decided:   December 3, 2014
    Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John Dykeman, Appellant Pro Se.      Donald John Zelenka, Senior
    Assistant   Attorney  General,   Melody   Jane  Brown,  Assistant
    Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    John     Dykeman      seeks          to    appeal     an     order        of     the
    magistrate       judge    denying      appointment           of     counsel    in        this   
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
          (2012)      action.             This      court     may        exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2012),
    and   certain         interlocutory       and       collateral       orders,        
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                              The order Dykeman
    seeks     to   appeal     is    neither    a        final    order    nor     an    appealable
    interlocutory or collateral order.                          See 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)
    (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).                           Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                         Because the appeal does not
    challenge a final order, we deny as unnecessary Dykeman’s motion
    for   a   certificate          of   appealability.            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)
    (2012).        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal     contentions      are      adequately           presented     in   the      materials
    before    this    court     and     argument         would    not    aid    the     decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-6977

Citation Numbers: 586 F. App'x 131

Judges: Keenan, Wynn, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/3/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024