Dean Steppello v. John Doe Captain ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                      UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 21-1266
    DEAN STEPPELLO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN DOE CAPTAIN, FCI Butner 2; JOHN DOE WARDEN, FCI BUTNER,
    Complex Warden; HEALTH ADMINISTRATOR; LT. SHAW, FCI 1; SAI
    MOORE; MS. DANIELS, Health Administrator’s Assistant; JOHN DOE, White
    Male; JOHN DOE, Warden FCI 2; JOHN DOE, Warden FCI 1; JOHN DOE, Captain
    FCI 1,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
    Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03238-FL)
    Submitted: August 19, 2021                                        Decided: August 23, 2021
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Dean Steppello, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Dean Steppello seeks to appeal the district court’s order noting deficiencies in his
    complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of
    Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
     (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C §§ 1346(b)(1),
    2671-2680, and directing him to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and certain interlocutory and
    collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
    ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
    Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949). The order Steppello seeks to appeal is neither a final
    order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Steppello’s requests for the appointment of counsel
    and to transfer his case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-1266

Filed Date: 8/23/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2021