Walter Booker v. R. Timmons , 698 F. App'x 88 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                      UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-6402
    WALTER D. BOOKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager; B. M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant; T. ROBINSON,
    Sergeant; G. D. FAULCON, Sergeant; LIEUTENANT TAYLOR; M. L. ROOK,
    Correctional Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations; WENDY S. HOBBS,
    Regional Administrator; EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden; C. PARKER,
    Warden; J. HARRIS, Warden; C. BOONE, Regional Ombudsman; S. TAPP,
    Human Rights Advocate; K. WHITEHEAD, Grievance Coordinator; L. GOODE,
    Unit Manager; D. DUGGER, Institutional Hearings Officer,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00555-JCC-IDD)
    Submitted: September 28, 2017                               Decided: October 2, 2017
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Walter D. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney
    General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Walter D. Booker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint
    raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the Religious Land Use and
    Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012), and state law. We
    have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
    reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Timmons, No. 1:14-cv-00555-JCC-IDD
    (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2014; July 14, 2015; Feb. 14, 2017). We deny the motion for
    injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-6402

Citation Numbers: 698 F. App'x 88

Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, King

Filed Date: 10/2/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024