United States v. Windsor Kessler, III , 690 F. App'x 837 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-7194
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WINDSOR WARNER KESSLER, III,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cr-00434-MJG-1; 1:14-cv-01894-MJG)
    Submitted: April 28, 2017                                         Decided: May 30, 2017
    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Windsor Warner Kessler, III, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States
    Attorney, Aaron Simcha Jon Zelinsky, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Windsor Warner Kessler, III appeals the district court’s orders denying his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2012) motion, his motion to reconsider, and his motion for a certificate of
    appealability. By order, we granted a partial certificate of appealability and ordered
    supplemental briefing on the issue of whether the district court abused its discretion in
    declining to conduct an evidentiary hearing on Kessler’s claim that he was entitled to
    equitable tolling of the habeas limitations period.         We have reviewed the record,
    including the parties’ informal briefs following the issuance of the certificate of
    appealability, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, as to the claim on which we
    granted a certificate of appealability, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
    United States v. Kessler, Nos. 1:11-cr-00434-MJG-1; 1:14-cv-01894-MJG (D. Md.
    July 22, 2016; Aug. 5 & 24, 2016). We dismiss the claims on which we previously
    denied a certificate of appealability, deny Kessler’s motion for appointment of counsel
    and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED IN PART;
    DISMISSED IN PART
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-7194

Citation Numbers: 690 F. App'x 837

Judges: Shedd, Floyd, Thacker

Filed Date: 5/30/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024