United States v. Champagne ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-4372
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BRIAN CHAMPAGNE,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.      Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
    (8:06-cr-00481-RWT-1)
    Submitted:    July 30, 2009                 Decided:   December 28, 2009
    Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Meghan Suzanne Skelton, Assistant Federal Public Defender,
    Greenbelt, Maryland; James Wyda, Federal Public Defender,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel J. Fortune, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mara B. Zusman,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Brian    Champagne     seeks     to   appeal     his   conviction      and
    sentence.       In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice
    of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment.                         Fed. R.
    App. P. 4(b)(1)(A).          With or without a motion, upon a showing of
    excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an
    extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal.                           Fed.
    R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 
    759 F.2d 351
    , 353
    (4th    Cir.     1985).         The   district       court    entered     judgment     on
    January 9, 2007.          The notice of appeal was filed on August 22,
    2008.     Because         Champagne failed to file a timely notice of
    appeal    or    to     obtain    an   extension      of   the    appeal    period,     we
    dismiss the appeal.             We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal     contentions     are    adequately       presented     in    the
    materials      before     the    court   and     argument       would   not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-4372

Filed Date: 12/28/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021