Wilson v. Carolina Power & Light Company ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1037
ALBERT PRESSLEY WILSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, d/b/a Progress Energy
Carolinas, Incorporated,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
PROGRESS ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:05-cv-03597-TLW)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Pressley Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Zebulon Dyer
Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN,
LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Albert Pressley Wilson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
dismissing Wilson’s civil complaint in which he asserted claims
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2006), and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.
§§ 621 to 634 (2006) and denying reconsideration thereof. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Wilson v. Carolina Power & Light Co., No. 4:05-cv-03597-
TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3