I.B. Ex Rel. Baron v. Weast ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-2165
    I. B., a minor, by his parents and next
    friends Steven and Marla Baron; STEVEN BARON;
    MARLA BARON,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    JERRY     D.    WEAST,     (officially     as)
    Superintendent,   Montgomery   County   Public
    Schools; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
    04-3308-PJM)
    Submitted:   May 10, 2006                     Decided:   May 24, 2006
    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, Williams, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael J. Eig, Haylie M. Iseman, MICHAEL J. EIG & ASSOCIATES,
    P.C., Chevy Chase, Maryland, for Appellants.  Jeffrey A. Krew,
    Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    I.B.     and   his    parents,       Steven    and   Marla    Baron,       sued    the
    Montgomery     County      Board     of    Education      and    Jerry     Weast,       the
    Superintendent of the Montgomery County Public Schools, alleging
    violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 
    20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487
    .         The plaintiffs sought equitable and monetary
    relief on the grounds that the defendants failed to provide I.B.
    with a free appropriate public education for the 2003-2004 school
    year. The district court rejected the plaintiffs’ claims, granting
    summary judgment in favor of the defendants.                            The plaintiffs
    appeal.     After reviewing the parties’ briefs, the record, and the
    district    court’s       thorough    ruling     from     the   bench,     we    find    no
    reversible error.         Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court for the reasons stated from the bench.                     See Baron v.
    Weast, Civil No. 04-3308 (D. Md. filed September 12, 2005 & entered
    September 13, 2005).            We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and   legal     contentions        are     adequately     presented      in     the
    materials     before      the    court    and    argument       would    not    aid     the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-2165

Judges: Wilkins, Williams, Hamilton

Filed Date: 5/24/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024