Rufus Anderson v. Greenville Hospital System , 627 F. App'x 188 ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2103
RUFUS JULIUS CORNELIUS ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
EMPLOYMENT AND WORKFORCE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(6:15-cv-02556-MGL)
Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination
complaint. The district court referred this case to a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012).
The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and
advised Anderson that failure to file timely objections to this
recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Anderson has waived appellate
review by failing to timely file objections after receiving
proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2