United States v. Allred ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7293
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JIMMY LEE ALLRED,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.   William L. Osteen,
    Jr., District Judge. (2:94-cr-00175-WO-1; 1:08-cv-00056-WO-DPD)
    Submitted:   February 25, 2010              Decided:   March 3, 2010
    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jimmy Lee Allred, Appellant Pro Se.    Angela Hewlett Miller,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jimmy Lee Allred seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    dismissing as untimely his 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West Supp. 2009)
    motion.     The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or
    judge     issues      a    certificate            of    appealability.                 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).             A certificate of appealability will not
    issue     absent      “a   substantial            showing        of    the       denial       of     a
    constitutional        right.”           
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)        (2006).            A
    prisoner        satisfies        this        standard          by     demonstrating              that
    reasonable       jurists     would       find          that    any    assessment            of     the
    constitutional        claims     by     the       district      court       is    debatable         or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court is likewise debatable.                      Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000);
    Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                                          We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Allred has
    not made the requisite showing.                        Accordingly, we deny Allred’s
    motion     for    a   certificate            of    appealability        and       dismiss          the
    appeal.     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions       are    adequately            presented       in       the    materials
    before    the    court     and    argument            would    not    aid    the       decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7293

Judges: Duncan, Agee, Hamilton

Filed Date: 3/3/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024