Jones v. J. Sargent Reynolds ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7053
BENJAMIN HENDERSON JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. SARGENT REYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, its
Teachers, Officers, Agents, Attorneys,
Proxies, Employees, Affiliates; D. GUILLORY;
EDWARD MURRAY; RON ANGELONE; JAMES S. GILMORE,
III; DOUGLAS WILDER; GEORGE F. ALLEN,
Governor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief
District Judge. (CA-95-616-AM)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Jones appeals from a district court order dismissing
his complaint without prejudice for failure to amend and particu-
larize his complaint and denying his motions for default judgment
and a temporary restraining order. We dismiss the appeal.
The district court's dismissal order makes clear that Jones
may save his complaint by amendment. Thus, this appeal of that
order is interlocutory. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local
293, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). Regarding the portion of
the order denying Jones's request for a temporary restraining
order, a request regarding facts unbound to the substance of the
initial complaint, we find no extraordinary circumstances that
would merit allowing an interlocutory appeal. Virginia v. Tenneco,
Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976).
Thus, we dismiss Jones's appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2