In Re: Green v. ( 1997 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-527
In Re: JAMES NEAL GREEN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-96-1787-3-19, CR-95-72)
Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Neal Green, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Neal Green has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus
in this court to compel the district court to expedite its consid-
eration of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). The granting of a writ of mandamus
is a drastic remedy which should only be used in extraordinary
situations. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Peti-
tioner must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought,
that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the act requested
by petitioner, and that there is no other adequate remedy avail-
able. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Durham, 860 F.2d 135,
138 (4th Cir. 1988). Green has failed to make the requisite showing
for such extraordinary relief. Our review of the district court
record discloses there has been no unnecessary delay in considering
Green's habeas petition. We therefore deny his petition for writ of
mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2