Owens v. Jefferson ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-7143
    CURTIS Q. OWENS,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    BERNEDETT JEFFERSON, LtSMU in their individual personal
    capacity under the color of state law; DARREN SEAWARD, Maj
    in their individual personal capacity under the color of
    state law; NFN ROBINSON, Inv DDI in their individual
    personal capacity under the color of state law; JERRY
    WASHINGTON, A-W in their individual personal capacity under
    the color of state law; ROBERT WARD, Dir of Ops in their
    individual personal capacity under the color of state law;
    JON OZMINT, Dir of SCDC in their individual personal
    capacity under the color of state law,
    Defendants – Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
    (0:09-cv-02888-TLW)
    Submitted:   November 19, 2010            Decided:   December 13, 2010
    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Curtis Q. Owens, Appellant Pro Se.  James Albert Stuckey, Jr.,
    William J. Thrower, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, PA, Charleston, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Curtis    Q.     Owens    appeals     the   district     court’s        order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief   on    his     
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
         (2006)     complaint.         We    have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.                         Accordingly,
    we affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Owens failed to
    properly    exhaust         available      administrative      remedies     as    to    his
    claims   of    constitutional          magnitude     as    required    by    42   U.S.C.
    § 1997e(a)     (2006).            Owens v.    Jefferson,    No.   0:09-cv-02888-TLW
    (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2010).              We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials     before        the    court     and   argument    would   not       aid    the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-7143

Filed Date: 12/13/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021