Williams v. Rogers ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6933
STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM F. ROGERS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-374)
Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 31, 2003
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e). We have reviewed the record and conclude the appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Rogers, No.
CA-03-374 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2