Hamilton v. Arthur , 272 F. App'x 245 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7008
    CHRISTOPHER GEORGE HAMILTON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    H. R. ARTHUR, SR., Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:06-cv-00682-jlk)
    Submitted:   March 21, 2008                 Decided:   April 3, 2008
    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Christopher George Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances
    Whalen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher George Hamilton seeks to appeal the district
    court’s order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000)
    petition.    The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or
    judge     issues   a   certificate    of     appealability.    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue
    absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
    right.”    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).        A prisoner satisfies this
    standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that
    any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court
    is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.          Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).          We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hamilton has
    not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Hamilton’s motion
    for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7008

Citation Numbers: 272 F. App'x 245

Judges: Wilkinson, Shedd, Wilkins

Filed Date: 4/3/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024