Munoz v. McCabe , 53 F. App'x 279 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-7274
    VICTOR MANUEL MUNOZ,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    SHERWOOD R. MCCABE, Superintendent of Harnett
    Correctional Institute,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham.   Wallace Wade Dixon,
    Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-01)
    Submitted:   December 16, 2002         Decided:     December 20, 2002
    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Victor Manuel Munoz, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Victor Manuel Munoz seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
    order   granting   Respondent’s   motion   for   summary   judgment   and
    denying relief on his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).
    The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant
    to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c) (2000). On appeal, Munoz reasserts the Fourth
    Amendment claim he raised in the district court. Because the state
    courts afforded Munoz a full and fair opportunity to litigate the
    substance of his Fourth Amendment claims, he has not made a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.          See
    Stone v. Powell, 
    428 U.S. 465
    , 482 (1976).       Munoz waived appellate
    review of his remaining claims because he did not raise them in his
    informal brief in this court.     4th Cir. R. 34(b).   Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-7274

Citation Numbers: 53 F. App'x 279

Judges: Luttig, Michael, Motz

Filed Date: 12/20/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024