Montgomery v. NC Attorney General ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7631
JOHN NEWMAN MONTGOMERY, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; LARRY SNEAD,
Superintendent,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-95-235)
Submitted: February 6, 1996 Decided: February 16, 1996
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Newman Montgomery, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe
DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of probable cause
to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Montgomery v. North Carolina Attorney Gen., No. CA-95-235
(M.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 1995). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny
the motion for appointment of counsel.
DISMISSED
2