Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, Virginia ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1898
MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE
DEPARTMENT; N.E. KARANGELEN, Officer,
Defendants– Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Richard Fox,
Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for
failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. City of Norfolk,
No. 2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. filed July 30; entered
July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2