Ross v. State of SC ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7263
NORRIS ROSS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLESTON COUNTY;
CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; HENRY DARGAN
MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
No. 03-7277
NORRIS ROSS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA, State; CHARLESTON COUNTY;
CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; HENRY DARGAN
MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-03-2169-2, CA-03-2205-2-18AJ)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norris Ross, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Norris Ross, a South Carolina
pre-trial detainee, appeals from the district court’s orders
accepting the reports and recommendations of a magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petitions
for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district
court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. South
Carolina, Nos. CA-03-2169-2; CA-03-2205-2-18AJ (D.S.C. filed Aug.
6, 2003 & entered Aug. 7, 2003; Aug. 13, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional
AFFIRMED
3