Cater v. Johnson , 304 F. App'x 188 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-7740
    MONTUSA KARUNDO T. PACE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    GENE JOHNSON,      Director   of   the   Virginia      Department   of
    Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (2:08-cv-00148-JBF-TEM)
    Submitted:    December 16, 2008             Decided:    December 24, 2008
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Montusa Karundo T. Pace, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Montusa Karundo T. Pace seeks to appeal the district
    court’s    order   accepting        the     recommendation       of    the   magistrate
    judge and dismissing as untimely his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000)
    petition.     The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
    or   judge   issues     a    certificate         of   appealability.         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).           A certificate of appealability will not
    issue     absent   “a       substantial       showing      of    the    denial      of    a
    constitutional     right.”            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)     (2000).          A
    prisoner     satisfies         this        standard      by     demonstrating          that
    reasonable     jurists       would     find      that    any    assessment        of     the
    constitutional     claims      by     the    district     court    is   debatable         or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court is likewise debatable.                 Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000);
    Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                                We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pace has not
    made the requisite showing.                Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                      We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-7740

Citation Numbers: 304 F. App'x 188

Judges: Wilkinson, Michael, King

Filed Date: 12/24/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024