In Re: Payne v. , 305 F. App'x 65 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-1788
    In Re:   LEO LIONEL PAYNE,
    Petitioner.
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
    Submitted:   August 18, 2008             Decided:   December 12, 2008
    Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS,* Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Leo Lionel Payne, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    *
    Senior Judge Wilkins was a member of the original panel but
    retired prior to the decision and did not participate in it. This
    opinion is thus filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 46
    (d).
    PER CURIAM:
    Leo Payne petitions this court for a writ of mandamus.
    He seeks relief from his state court conviction for grand larceny-
    auto.     Payne also seeks an order directing the state court judge
    who presided over his criminal proceeding to take certain actions.
    Mandamus       is    a   drastic    remedy       and   should     be   used       only   in
    extraordinary situations.            Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 
    426 U.S. 394
    , 402 (1976); In re: Beard, 
    811 F.2d 818
    , 826 (4th Cir.
    1987).     The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden
    of showing that he has no other adequate means to obtain the relief
    he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and
    indisputable. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 
    449 U.S. 33
    , 35
    (1980).    This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus
    relief    against        state   officials,      Gurley      v.   Superior    Court      of
    Mecklenburg County, 
    411 F.2d 586
    , 587 (4th Cir. 1969), or to review
    state court orders, see District of Columbia Court of Appeals v.
    Feldman, 
    460 U.S. 462
    , 482 (1983).
    The   relief      Payne   seeks    is   not    available      by    way   of
    mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.                      We dispense
    with    oral    argument      because    the     facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1788

Citation Numbers: 305 F. App'x 65

Judges: King, Gregory, Wilkins

Filed Date: 12/12/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024