McDaniel v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. , 305 F. App'x 80 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-1860
    APRIL MCDANIEL,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    GREYHOUND LINES, INC.; LISA BORROW, Manager at Greyhound;
    TOMMY SCHEWL, Area Manager at Greyhound; JANE DOE, a/k/a
    Leslie,
    Defendants – Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.   Frank D. Whitney,
    District Judge. (3:08-cv-00130-FDW-CH)
    Submitted:    December 11, 2008             Decided:   December 15, 2008
    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    April McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.      Michael Douglas McKnight,
    Robert Allen Sar, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    April     McDaniel         appeals     the      district      court’s     order
    dismissing     without          prejudice     her     civil        complaint      alleging
    employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights
    Act of 1964, as amended.                The court specifically dismissed the
    action noting that because it had not ruled on the merits of the
    compliant    and     was    dismissing        it   for      lack    of    subject    matter
    jurisdiction    and    personal          jurisdiction,        McDaniel      was     free   to
    refile her complaint after curing these defects.                             A dismissal
    without    prejudice       is    not    reviewable       by   the    court    unless       the
    reasons    stated     for       the    dismissal      clearly       disclose      that     no
    amendment to the complaint could cure its defects.                             See Domino
    Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    ,
    1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).                 In the present case, the district
    court     properly    found       that    McDaniel       failed      to    allege     facts
    establishing subject matter and personal jurisdiction. Because
    McDaniel    could     possibly         cure   these      defects     by    amending        her
    complaint, we dismiss this appeal.                    
    Id.
         We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-1860

Citation Numbers: 305 F. App'x 80

Judges: Niemeyer, Duncan, Agee

Filed Date: 12/15/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024