Cunningham v. Lemmon ( 2007 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1292
WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID LEMMON, Colonel,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
District Judge. (6:06-cv-00169)
Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Grottendieck
Lanham, John A. Hoyer, STATE POLICE LEGAL COUNSEL, South
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William Cunningham appeals a district court order and
judgment order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and
dismissing his civil rights complaint challenging provisions of the
West Virginia Sex Offender Registration Act (“Act”), West Va. Code
Ann. §§ 15-12-1 - 15-12-10 (LexisNexis 2004 & Supp. 2007). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for
the reasons cited by the district court. See Cunningham v. Lemmon,
No. 6:06-cv-00169 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 22, 2007). Cunningham has
filed motions to certify questions to the United States Supreme
Court and to file a supplemental informal brief. We deny the
motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -