Evelyn Manteris v. Michael Astrue ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-1605
    EVELYN MANTERIS,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL   J.   ASTRUE,   Commissioner        of   Social   Security
    Administration,
    Defendant – Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.      Norman K. Moon,
    Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00034-NKM-BWC)
    Submitted:   August 25, 2011                 Decided:   August 29, 2011
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Evelyn Manteris, Appellant Pro Se.     Kenneth DiVito, Assistant
    Regional Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Adam Siry, SOCIAL
    SECURITY   ADMINISTRATION,   Philadelphia,    Pennsylvania,  for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Evelyn Manteris seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
    and granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment.                              We
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice
    of appeal was not timely filed.
    When the United States or its officer or agency is a
    party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty
    days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or
    order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court
    extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or
    reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).                          “[T]he
    timely   filing     of   a     notice   of       appeal   in   a   civil   case      is    a
    jurisdictional requirement.”             Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    ,
    214 (2007).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket
    on March 30, 2011.           The notice of appeal was filed on June 2,
    2011.    Because Manteris failed to file a timely notice of appeal
    or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
    dismiss the appeal.            We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal    contentions     are       adequately      presented    in    the
    materials      before    the    court   and       argument     would   not     aid    the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1605

Judges: Motz, Duncan, Keenan

Filed Date: 8/29/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024