United States v. Frederick Burgess ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7046
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
FREDERICK FRISALYN BURGESS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8)
Submitted: October 28, 2013 Decided: November 12, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Frisalyn Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley
Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Frisalyn Burgess appeals the district
court’s text order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Burgess, No. 4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8 (D.S.C. June 25, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2