United States v. Cribb , 280 F. App'x 310 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-6397
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CHARLES ALLEN CRIBB,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (4:05-cr-00901-RBH-2)
    Submitted:   May 29, 2008                  Decided:   June 5, 2008
    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charles Allen Cribb, Appellant Pro Se.   Alfred William Walker
    Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Allen Cribb seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order   denying   his    motion   for   reduction    of   sentence    under   
    18 U.S.C.A. § 3582
     (West 2000 & Supp. 2008).            In criminal cases, the
    defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the
    entry   of   judgment.     Fed.   R.    App.   P.   4(b)(1)(A);   see    United
    States v. Alvarez, 
    210 F.3d 309
    , 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding
    that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal
    period applies).        With or without a motion, upon a showing of
    excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an
    extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal.              Fed. R.
    App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 
    759 F.2d 351
    , 353 (4th
    Cir. 1985).
    The district court entered its oral order denying the
    motion for reduction of sentence on January 29, 2008.                The notice
    of appeal was filed on March 11, 2008.              Because Cribb failed to
    file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the
    appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.               We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-6397

Citation Numbers: 280 F. App'x 310

Judges: Traxler, Gregory, Shedd

Filed Date: 6/5/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024