In re: D'Anjou v. ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7123
In Re: ROBERT AUGUSTINE D’ANJOU,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Audita Querela. (CR-91-86-MU)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 15, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Augustine D’Anjou, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Augustine D’Anjou petitions this court for a writ of
audita querela, seeking to have this court recall its mandate in
United States v. D’Anjou, No. 99-7004 (4th Cir. Nov. 10, 1999)
(unpublished). We note that we previously denied D’Anjou’s earlier
motion to recall the mandate, and we conclude that a writ of audita
querela is not an appropriate means of seeking recall of a court’s
mandate. See United States v. Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d 1077, 1079
(9th Cir. 2001). We therefore grant the motion for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and deny the petition for a writ of audita
querela. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2