United States v. Lewis , 308 F. App'x 682 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-7518
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:07-cr-00104-JRS-1)
    Submitted:    January 15, 2009               Decided:   January 22, 2009
    Before MOTZ and      SHEDD,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.                Kevin Christopher
    Nunnally, Special Assistant United States          Attorney, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald Wayne Lewis seeks to appeal from the district
    court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal charges
    against him based on an alleged Speedy Trial Act violation, and
    denying his motion for transcripts.                  This court may exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2006),
    and   certain    interlocutory     and       collateral    orders,     
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
     (1949).                 The order Lewis seeks to
    appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
    or collateral order.          See United States v. MacDonald, 
    435 U.S. 850
    , 853-54 (1978); United States v. Buchanan, 
    946 F.2d 325
     (4th
    Cir. 1991).     Accordingly, we deny Lewis’ motions for appointment
    of counsel and to dismiss the charges against him, deny his
    remaining pending motions, and dismiss the appeal for lack of
    jurisdiction.      We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before   the    court   and   argument       would   not   aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-7518

Citation Numbers: 308 F. App'x 682

Judges: Motz, Shedd, Hamilton

Filed Date: 1/22/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024